McMillan also opined his ruling does not bar Erica Witt from seeking visitation with the child, likening her to a stepparent.Įrica Witt left the courtroom in tears. "Given the novelty of this issue, the court thinks it appropriate to see if the appellate courts want to address this," he said. He is allowing Schwamm to appeal, putting the divorce action on hold pending a decision by the Tennessee Court of Appeals on whether to hear the issue. "I believe as a trial court I am not to plow new ground, but to apply precedent and the law," McMillan said. "The paramount consideration for the courts is the best interest of the child."īut McMillan said it was not up to the courts to enact "social policy" via legal rulings and a strict reading of the artificial insemination law tied his hands in this case. "There has been a commitment on the part of (Erica Witt) to raise this child, to be there for this child," Schwamm said. Schwamm called the language of husband and wife outdated and urged McMillan to simply update it via his ruling, just as court clerks' offices across the state are now revamping all manner of domestic forms, from marriage certificates to divorce petitions, to accommodate same-sex couples. Under this statute, we do not believe (Erica Witt) would qualify as a parent." "What we're asking the court to do today is interpret (the artificial insemination) statute as it is. "That terminology is not interchangeable," he said. Just because the statute reads man and woman, this court can interpret the statute in a manner that makes it constitutional." "(Tennessee marriage certificates) still (indicate) male and female, but surely that no longer applies. "The argument that marriage may only consist of a 'husband' and a 'wife' has been held to be unconstitutional," Schwamm said. That ruling did not address divorce or parental rights in a divorce in which neither same-sex partner legally adopted the child they call their own.Įrica Witt's attorney, Virginia Schwamm, contends the same reasoning used by the nation's high court in marriage applies in divorce and custody matters. Supreme Court decision last year recognizing the rights of same-sex couples to marry. Tennessee still doesn't have a law on the books officially recognizing same-sex marriage but is essentially under a mandate to do so due to a U.S. "That terminology is not interchangeable," Harber argued at a hearing Friday. Her attorney, John Harber, contended the only law on Tennessee's books addressing parenting rights in the case of artificial insemination - enacted in 1977 - makes clear the law applies only to husbands. In February, Sabrina Witt filed for divorce. Because Tennessee did not then recognize same-sex marriage as legal, Erica Witt's name was not placed on the baby's birth certificate. Sabrina Witt bore a baby girl as a result in January 2015. "I believe this is a situation where (Erica Witt) has no biological relationship with this child, has no contractual relationship with this child," 4th Circuit Court Judge Greg McMillan ruled.Įrica Witt and Sabrina Witt legally wed in Washington, D.C., in April 2014, bought a home in Knoxville and decided to have a child via artificial insemination from an anonymous donor. If Erica Witt were a man, she would have just as much right to a daughter conceived via artificial insemination as her spouse.īut in the first ruling of its kind in Tennessee, a Knox County judge on Friday opined that because she is a woman who legally married a woman, state law does not confer to her the power of decision-making over the child or the obligation to provide financial support for the girl now that the same-sex couple is divorcing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |